As part of a large pan-European project on co-creating public services we supported the design of a programme in England that attempted to operationalise research on desistance, through a model of co-created, strengths-based working. We then evaluated its implementation and impact.
Authors
Susan Baines, Chris Fox, Jordan Harrison, Andrew Smith and Caroline Marsh
Abstract
As part of a large pan-European project on co-creating public services we supported the design of a programme in England that attempted to operationalise research on desistance, through a model of co-created, strengths-based working. We then evaluated its implementation and impact. The programme was implemented in a Community Rehabilitation Company. It was delivered in the context of rapid organisational change, often in response to rapidly changing external events and a turbulent policy environment. These factors impeded implementation. An impact evaluation did not identify a statistically significant difference in re-offending rates between the intervention group and a comparator group. However, in-depth qualitative evaluation identified positive examples of co-production and co-creation, with individual case managers and service users supportive and noting positive change. Taken as a whole our findings suggest that a co-created, strengths-based model of probation case management is promising but needs to be accompanied by wider systems change if it is to be embedded successfully.
Publication link
Full reference
Baines, S., Fox, C., Harrison, J., Smith, A., Marsh, C. (2021) ‘Co-creating rehabilitation: Findings from a pilot and implications for wider public service reform.’ Probation Journal, pp.1-20.
Linked Project
Publication Date
2021
DOI
10.1177/02645505211065683